<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Netflix Moment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategy6.com/googles-netflix-moment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategy6.com/googles-netflix-moment/</link>
	<description>Website Design &#38; SEO Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuly Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.strategy6.com/googles-netflix-moment/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Zuly Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategy6.com/?p=544#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I think this is a good move by Google. Ad-heavy sites are terrible for the internet.

However, I do agree with you that Google is getting a little too big for its own good. It seems as though Google is trying to take over the internet one baby step at a time. For example, Google and Twitter&#039;s realtime search agreement &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_shutters_realtime_search_for_now.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;expired&lt;/a&gt; a few months back; eliminating realtime tweets from Google&#039;s search results. Then just last week Google &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/search-plus-your-world.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that Google+ posts will have a prominent position in your search results if you are signed in. What a coincidence. The feature can be disabled, but I can&#039;t help but think that in the not too distant future we will no longer have the option to disable it.

Here&#039;s an interesting rant on why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_is_going_to_mess_up_the_internet.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google+ hates the internet.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a good move by Google. Ad-heavy sites are terrible for the internet.</p>
<p>However, I do agree with you that Google is getting a little too big for its own good. It seems as though Google is trying to take over the internet one baby step at a time. For example, Google and Twitter&#8217;s realtime search agreement <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_shutters_realtime_search_for_now.php" rel="nofollow">expired</a> a few months back; eliminating realtime tweets from Google&#8217;s search results. Then just last week Google <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/search-plus-your-world.html" rel="nofollow">announced</a> that Google+ posts will have a prominent position in your search results if you are signed in. What a coincidence. The feature can be disabled, but I can&#8217;t help but think that in the not too distant future we will no longer have the option to disable it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting rant on why <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_is_going_to_mess_up_the_internet.php" rel="nofollow">Google+ hates the internet.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
